The contempt petition was closed after the petitioner's counsel stated that the court's earlier order had been complied with and the petitioner did not wish to proceed further. The rule, if any, was discharged.
Contempt petition closed; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.09 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(D) 43/2021
MOHAMMAD AKBAR BABA AND ORS
…Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through: Ms. Saniya Qadir, Advocate
Vs.
Mr. P. K. POLE AND ORS
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Alla-ud-Din Ganie, AAG for R-1 & R-3 Mr. Faizan Ahmad, CGC vice Mr. T.M. Shamsi, DSGI for R-2 and R-4
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
16.09.2026
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
SRINAGAR:
16.09.2026
“ARIF”
Mohammad Akbar Baba and Ors
Mr. P. K. Pole and Ors
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
