The petitioner failed to appear or prosecute the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution, vacated any interim directions, and closed the connected contempt petition.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim directions vacated; contempt petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.26 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 42/2025 In[WP(C) 3434/2023] c/w WP(C) 3434/2023
MOHAMMAD GHANEEMAT JEELANI
…PETITIONER(S)
Through: None V/s.
OWAIS AHMAD AND ORS.
...RESPONDENT(S)
Through: Ms. Shaila Shameem, Assisting Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE. ORDER
18.09.2026
WP(C) No. 3434/2023:-
CCP(S) No. 42/2025 in WP(C) No. 3434/2023 :
(RAJESH SEKHRI) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
18.09.2026 “Mir Arif”
MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
19.09.26
Mohammad Ghaneemat Jeelani
Owais Ahmad and Ors.
Rajesh Sekhri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
