Contempt proceedings closed as petitioners' counsel submitted the underlying order for payment of balance compensation has been complied with.
Contempt petition closed as satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 99
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 369/2025
Sikindla Devi & Ors. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate
Vs
Kumar Rajeev Ranjan Commissioner Secretary & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER 18.09.2026
Jammu 18.09.2026 Amit
(Sindhu Sharma)
Sikindla Devi & Ors.
Kumar Rajeev Ranjan Commissioner Secretary & Ors.
Sindhu Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
