Bail application dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner (UT through Police Station Rajpora) failed to appear on the hearing date. No counsel represented the petitioner. Interim directions, if any, were vacated.
Bail application dismissed for non-prosecution; interim directions vacated
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 100 Suppl. List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Bail App. No. 93/2025
UT through Police station Rajpora …Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
Shameema Akhter ...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Younis Ahad, Adv.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE. ORDER
18.09.2026
01. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on August, 2026 and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference is drawn that the petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the instant matter.
02. Dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected CM(s).
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
18.09.2026
UT through Police station Rajpora
Shameema Akhter
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
