Gulzar Bano and Another Vs the Ut of J and K through Its Principal Secretary Home and Others

¶1

Serial No. 90

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU

¶3

WP(C) No. 2072/2025

¶4

Gulzar Bano, age 28 years D/o Roshan Din, W/o Mohd. Sadiq, R/o Village Maha Kund, Tehsil Gool, District Ramban At present village Dashan Gool, Tehsil Gool, District Ramban

¶5

Mohd. Sadiq, age 32 years S/o Ali Mohd. R/o Village Dashan Gool, Tehsil Gool, District Ramban

¶6

…..Petitioner(s)

¶7

Through: Ms. Supriya Chouhan, Advocate.

¶8

Vs

¶9

The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir Through its Principal Secretary (Home), Civil Secretariat, Jammu.

¶10

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ramban

¶11

The Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station, Gool.

¶12

Roshan Din S/o Ashmat, (Father of Gulzar Bano)

¶13

Nazir Ahmed S/o Ashmat, (Uncle of Gulzar Bano)

¶14

Abdul Karim S/o Faqir Mohd. (Maternal uncle of Gulzar Bano)

¶15

Tufail Hussain, S/o Roshan Din (Elder Brother of Gulzar Bano)

¶16

Mohd. Zafar S/o Shafi Mohd. (Cousin brother of Gulzar Bano)

¶17

.…. Respondent(s)

¶18

Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.

¶19

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

¶20

ORDER

¶21

(01.08.2025)

¶22

2 WP(C) No. 2072/2025

¶23

The petitioners, both being of the age of majority, have exercised their free will to enter into marital relationship and for that have earned displeasure of their respective families.

¶24

To lend confirmation to the fact of their marriage having been solemnized out of their free will and volition, the petitioners have put on record a notarized marriage agreement dated 29.07.2025.

¶25

Along with the writ petition, the petitioner No. 1’s 10^th class marks card evidencing her date of birth as 10.01.1997 also annexed which confirms the fact that the petitioner No. 1 is and was major at the time of solemnizing marriage with the petitioner No. 2.

¶26

The petitioners are in hiding fearing about safety and security of their life and limb suffering wrong at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 8 who are to be carrying hard feelings against the petitioners for their act of marrying each other.

¶27

Keeping in view the mandate and dictate of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as laid down in case of Lata Singh vs. State of UP and anr, 2006 (5) SCC 475 in terms whereof a direction has been set into effect for the Govt. Administration and Police Authorities throughout the Country to see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a girl or boy who is also major, then the marrying individuals are not to be harassed by any one nor to be subjected

¶28

3 WP(C) No. 2072/2025

¶29

to threats or acts of violence, and in case any such threat or harassment is confronted to be inflicted on the individuals then the persons responsible for holding out such threats/harassments are to be taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the Police against such persons and further stern action to be taken as provided by law.

¶30

Article 144 of the Constitution of India mandates all Authorities, Civil and Judicial, in the territory of India to act in aid of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Bearing this constitutional sanction in perspective and the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court set into place, it is a matter of duty for the Police Officials as well as officials of the concerned Civil Administration, irrespective of hierarchical position, to ensure that marrying individuals who are major and have chosen to become husband and wife out of their free will and volition are not to fear anybody causing any harm to their life and limb.

¶31

This petition at the threshold is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2-Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Ramban to ensure by issuing appropriate directions to the respondent No. 3-Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station, Gool, District Ramban that the petitioners, namely, Gulzar Bano and Mohd. Sadiq are not subjected to any harassment/intimidation/threats at the hands of the respondents No. 4 to 8 or any other person acting at the behest and/or on

¶32

4 WP(C) No. 2072/2025

¶33

behalf of the respondents No. 4 to 8. Further more in case the SHO Police Station, Gool, District Ramban or any other Police Station has registered any FIR at the instance of the respondents No. 4 to 8 against the petitioners or either of the two petitioners then also no arrest of the petitioners shall be carried out or facilitated by the SHO Police Station, Gool, District Ramban.

¶34

Disposed of.

¶35

(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE

¶36

JAMMU 01.08.2025 Shivalee

¶37

Shivalee Khajuria 2025.08.01 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Gulzar Bano and Another v. the Ut of J and K through Its Principal Secretary Home and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulzar Bano and Another v. the Ut of J and K through Its Principal Secretary Home and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankesh Kumar and Another Vs Ut of J and K Th Director General of Police, Jammu and Others

M/S K P Banquet Pvt. Ltd. Th Nipun Kesar Vs Vikas Baru and Others

Sant Singh and Anr. Vs Shailender Kumar Principal Secretary, Public Works (R and B) Department, Jammu and Others

Zakir Hussain Vs Ut of J and K Th Commissioner Secretary to Government Home Department Jammu and Others

M/S Farsang Technoid Vs M. Raju and Ors. (Jal Shakti Department)

Imran Ahmad Mir and Another Vs State of Jk and Others. (Housing Deptt)