Disposed

Style of Star Academy of Education Th Abdul Rashid v. Ut of J and K Th Commissioner Secretary , School Education Department, Jammu and Others

J&K HC7 May 2025WP(C)/1136/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of a writ petition by directing respondents to consider confirming the 2024-25 academic session results for a private academy's classes 1st to 5th within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the request to declare and confirm the result of students of 1st to 5th classes within two weeks.

Style of Star Academy of Education Th Abdul Rashid Vs… — Education and Admissions | J&K HC (2025)

¶1

Sr. No. 01

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU

¶3

WP(C) No.1136/2025 CM No.2673/2025

¶4

Style of Star Academy of Education

¶5

….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)

¶6

Through :- Mr. Ch. Mohd. Shabir, Advocate

V/s

UT of J&K and others

….Respondent(s)

Through :- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER

¶12

07.05.2025

¶13

By way of instant writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction upon respondent Nos.3 and 4 to confirm and declare the result of the students of the petitioner-Academy from class 1^st to 5^th for the academic session 2024-25.

¶14

It is submitted that the petitioner has been granted provisional permission to run the academy upto 3^rd class with further permission to add a class every year upto 5^th till March, 2020 vide Office Order No.24/CEOR/Pvt. Schools of 2017 dated 15.06.2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner was running its academy in a rental accommodation and in the year 2020, after constructing its own building in the same location, shifted the academy from rented building to its own building, against which a complaint was moved by a vested interest and respondent No.3, herein issued a notice dated 10^th February, 2020, thereby directing the petitioner to restrain its territory authorized to run the school i.e. habitation Pattan Gurha within two days otherwise permission to run the school shall stand cancelled. The said notice came to be challenged by the petitioner by filing WP(C) No.503/2020.

¶15

¶16

According to the petitioner, on earlier occasions also, when the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have not declared and confirm the result of the petitioner-academy, this Court vide its orders dated 27^th April, 2022 and 28^th June, 2024 passed in different applications moved by the petitioner in the aforesaid writ petition, directed respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to declare and confirm the result of the students of 1^st to 5^th classes for the academic session 2021-22 and 2023-24 respectively.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that on 10^th July, 2024, the petitioner could not cause appearance, due to which the aforesaid writ petition [WP(C) No.503/2020] came to be dismissed for non-appearance. According to the petitioner application seeking restoration stands filed and the same is still pending adjudication before this Court.

¶18

It is further submitted that the petitioner has conducted the final examination of the students for 1^st to 5^th class and all the students have been declared “Pass” and now the result has to be confirmed by respondent Nos. 3 and 4 for the purpose of authenticity of the result declared by the petitioner, however, the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are not declaring/confirming the result of the students of the petitioner-academy for the session 2024-25. As per the petitioner, the confirmation of the result shall make the students eligible to get the admission in the next higher class to pursue the higher studies.

¶19

Petitioner has relied upon the orders dated 27.04.2022 and 28.06.2024 passed in WP(C) No.503/2020 titled Style of Star Academy of Education v. UT of J&K and others

¶20

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied, if the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent

¶21

¶22

Nos. 3 and 4 to consider the declaration/confirming of result of the students of the petitioner-academy for the academic session 2204-25, within a reasonable period to time.

¶23

Mr. Raman Sharma, learned AAG, who is present in the Court, waives notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that he would not be averse to the proposition being made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶24

In view of the above and in keeping in view orders dated 27.04.2022 and 28.06.2024 passed in WP(C) No.503/2020, this writ petition is disposed of, at the threshhold, with a direction to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to consider the request of the petitioner to declare and confirm the result of the students of 1^st to 5^th classes of the petitioner-school within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶25

(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Judge
Jammu:
07.05.2025
Vinod

¶26

Whether the order is reportable: No

¶27

Vinod Kumar 2025.05.07 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Style of Star Academy of Education Th Abdul Rashid v. Ut of J and K Th Commissioner Secretary , School Education Department, Jammu and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Style of Star Academy of Education Th Abdul Rashid v. Ut of J and K Th Commissioner Secretary , School Education Department, Jammu and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Gee Kay Traders Th. Dharam Chand Gupta Vs Navin Kumar Choyudhary Secy. Industries and Commerce Deptt. and Ors.

Abhiney Gupta and Ors. Vs Smvdu Katra and Ors.

Jai Ram and Others Vs Ut of J and K Th Commissioner Secretary, Revenue Department, Jammu and Others

Om Parkash Vs State Th.U.D.D.and Ors.

Ravinder Singh and Ors. Vs State Th.Housing and Urban Deptt.and Ors.

Ravinder Singh Vs Om Parkash