Writ petitions dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioners did not appear on consecutive hearing dates; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 20 Reg Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
SWP 486/2019[WP(C) 740/2019] CM(1409/2019[1/2019]) CM(6747/2020) c/w i)WP(C) 1163/2021 CM(3284/2025) CM(3922/2021).
MOHAMMAD HANEEF BHAT AND ORS.
…Petitioner (s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
TATER OF J AND K AND ORS.
Through: Mr. Jehangir Dar, GA.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE. ORDER 21-11-2025
None appears for the petitioners. A perusal of the minutes of proceedings reveals that no one has been appearing in these case on behalf of the petitioners for the last two consecutive dates of hearing. Today also when the matter was taken up for hearing, none has appeared for the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest to prosecute their case.
In view of the above, both the petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
SRINAGAR
21-11-2025
Showkat Khan
Mohammad Haneef Bhat and Ors.
State of J&K and Ors.
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
