Swaran Parihar v. State Th.G.a.D.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
46 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 46
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: SWP 2758/2014
Swarn Parihar …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Rahil Raja, Advocate
V/s State & Ors. ... Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sagira Jaffer, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr.AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 01.09.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time,
the present petition has been rendered infructuous and nothing survives for further
adjudication. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the submissions made hereinabove and having regard to the record, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
Jammu 01.09.2025 AKHILESH
Swarn Parihar
State & Ors.
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court