Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was unrepresented on successive dates, indicating loss of interest; interim directions, if any, stood vacated along with connected applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 13
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2665/2012 IA No. 4164/2012 IA No. 626/2013 IA No. 393/2015
Mohammad Akram …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
State of J & K & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, assisting counsel to Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER
(09.07.2025)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and so was the case on
the previous date of hearing as well, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the case.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along
with connected application(s).
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
Jammu 09.07.2025 Diksha
Mohammad Akram
State of J & K & Ors.
M A Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
