Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after respondents reported the petitioner's grievance stood redressed and she filed an affidavit expressing no further interest; petitioner's counsel had no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 09 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2042/2011
Brahma Devi
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:Mr. P.N. Bhat, Advocate
V/s
State of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER
08.09.2025
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that petitioner has
furnished an affidavit stating that she is no longer interested in this
petition, as her grievance has been redressed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not in contact
with her and has no instructions.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Vinod Chatterji Koul) Judge
Jammu:
08.09.2025 Shafqat
Brahma Devi
State of J&K and others
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
