Nisar Ahmad Kakapori and Anr. Vs Aijaz Ahmad Kadoo and Another (pil 22/2012 at jammu wing)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR

Reserved on: 24.11.2025 Pronounced on: 04.12.2025 Uploaded on: 04.12.2025 Whether the operative part or full judgment is pronounced: Full judgment.

¶3

CJ Court

¶4

Ref(C) No. 01/2025

¶5

Nisar Ahmad Kakapori and Anr.

¶6

...Petitioner(S)/Appellant(s)

¶7

Through: - Mr. Mohammad Ibrahim Mehraj, Adv.

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Aijaz Ahmad Kadoo& Anr.

¶10

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶11

Through: - None

¶12

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

¶13

JUDGMENT

¶14

OSWAL ‘J’

¶15

This reference has been made by the Court of learned Civil Judge Senior Division (Sub Judge) Bijbehara (for short ‘the trial court’) in a suit titled, Nisar Ahmad Kakapora and another vs. Aijaz Ahmad Kadoo.

¶16

In the reference, it is stated that in a pending suit for ejectment, recovery of possession, arrears of rent and mesne profits between petitioners/plaintiffs and his tenant (defendants), an issue in respect of the maintainability of

¶17

Ref(C) No. 01/2025 Page 1 of 4

¶18

the suit before the Civil Court under the Jammu and Kashmir Residential and Commercial Tenancy Act, 2012 was framed and decided in favour of the petitioners/plaintiffs and against the respondents/ defendants vide order dated 20.02.2023. The reason that prompted the trial court to make reference is an order dated 16.05.2024 passed in Civil Revision No. 04/2024 titled, Manoj Kumar vs. Dara Singh , whereby the learned Single Judge, by referring to the position of law post J&K Reorganization Act, 2019, has observed that in Table 4 of Schedule 5^th of the J&K Reorganization Act 2019, there is no mention of Jammu and Kashmir Houses and Shops Rent Control Act, meaning thereby that the said Act has not been continued in terms of Section 95 (2) of Act of 2019, and as such, has directed the listing of the said case along with PIL No. 22/2012, for clarification of the applicability or otherwise of the provisions of the J&K Houses and Shops Rent Control Act to proceedings filed after coming into force of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act 2019.

¶19

Accordingly, by citing the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Revision No. 04/2024, the present reference has been made.

¶20

Despite service of notice, none has appeared for the respondents.

¶21

Ref(C) No. 01/2025 Page 2 of 4

¶22

Mr. Mohd Ibrahim Mehraj, learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs has argued that the reference is incompetent, as once an issue stands already decided by the trial court, it is not open for the trial court to refer the same issue to this Court, more particularly when the case is pending for final arguments.

¶23

Heard and perused the record.

¶24

In the reference, it has been mentioned that an issue in respect of the maintainability of the suit before a Civil Court under the Jammu and Kashmir Residential and Commercial Tenancy Act, 2012 was framed, and came to be decided by the learned trial court vide order dated 20.02.2023 in favour of the petitioners/plaintiffs and against the defendants/respondents.

¶25

We find merit in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that once an issue has been finally decided, the trial court lacks the jurisdiction to re-open or revisit the same. If the respondents were aggrieved by the order dated 20.02.2023, they were obligated to challenge that order through the remedy available under law. The order dated 20.02.2023 has attained finality before the learned trial court. A litigant who has not availed the appropriate legal remedy against an order cannot be permitted to re-agitate the same issue

¶26

Ref(C) No. 01/2025 Page 3 of 4

¶27

before the same court at any subsequent stage of the proceedings.

¶28

In view of the above, we are of the considered view that the present reference is incompetent. The same is answered accordingly. Needless to say that any observation made by this Court hereinabove is only for the purpose of answering the reference, as we have not examined the validity of the order dated 20.02.2023. The issue sought to be clarified in the aforesaid Civil Revision shall be considered and decided exclusively in that matter.

¶29

Copy of this order be sent to the trial court for information.

¶30

(RAJNESH OSWAL) (ARUN PALLI)
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu
04.12.2025
Karam Chand.
Whether the Judgment is speaking: No/Yes
Whether the judgment is reportable: No/Yes

¶31

Rakesh Kumar 2025.12.04 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶32

Ref(C) No. 01/2025

¶33

Page 4 of 4

Nisar Ahmad Kakapori and Anr. v. Aijaz Ahmad Kadoo and Another (pil 22/2012 at jammu wing)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nisar Ahmad Kakapori and Anr. v. Aijaz Ahmad Kadoo and Another (pil 22/2012 at jammu wing)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajit Kumar Singh Vs U.O.I. Th. Home Secy. and Ors.

Dr.Renu Gupta Vs State Th.Higher Education and Ors.

Ut of Jk through Additional Chief Secretary Finance Department Vs Madan Lal and Another

Ut of Jk through Secretary Health and Medical Education Department Vs Monika Hansa and Othrs

Ut of Jk through Secretary Health and Medical Education Department and Anr. Vs Jatinder Singh and Othrs

Jk Finance Company Th Ashok Bamba Jammu. Vs Union Ofn India Th Secretary Revenue Ministry of Finance Deptt and Others.