Shafat Ahmad Khan v. Union Territory of J and K and Ors. (Revenue)
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal withdrawn by the appellant to pursue remedies available under law; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.09
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
LPA No.130/2025 CM No.3889/2025
Shafat Ahmad Khan
…Petitioner(s)/Appellants.
Through: Mr. Javid Samad, Advocate.
Vs.
Union Territory of J&K and others. ….Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
O R D E R 02.07.2025
Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he be permitted to withdraw the appeal to enable the appellant to pursue the remedy as would be available under law.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Srinagar 02.07.2025
Abdul Qayoom, Secy.
Abdul Qayoom Lone I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 02.07.2025 17:30
Shafat Ahmad Khan
Union Territory of J&K and others
Arun Palli
Rajnesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court