Petitioners sought withdrawal of their petition with liberty to approach the Trial Court for cancellation of warrant. The court recorded counsel's statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, leaving the Trial Court free to consider any such application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 3 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) No. 460/2025 CrlM No. 1107/2025
Syed Nazim Hussain and Ors.
…Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Bhat Khursheed, Advocate
Vs.
Syed Naseeb Fatima
...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R
18.11.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for a while, prays for withdrawal of instant petition with liberty to make an application before the Trial Court for cancellation of warrant. His statement is taken on record.
In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The Trial Court shall consider and pass appropriate orders on application of petitioners for cancellation of warrant, if filed.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
18.11.2025 Manzoor
Manzoor Ul Hassan Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Srinagar 20.11.2025 10.58
Syed Nazim Hussain and Ors.
Syed Naseeb Fatima
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
