Petitioner absent on multiple hearing dates; High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated interim directions, if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 08 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Through Virtual Mode
CM(M) 211/2024 CM(3686/2024)
Juma Sheikh
… Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: -
None.
V/s
Union Territory of J&K and Ors.
… Respondent(s)
Through: -
Ms Sabreena Fayaz, Advocate for R-7.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE. (ORDER)
05.12.2025
There was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner on two previous dates of hearing. Same is the position today. It appears that the Petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this case any further. Accordingly, the Petition shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
December 5th 2025
“TAHIR”
Tahir Manzoor Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Juma Sheikh
Union Territory of J&K and Ors.
M. A. Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
