J&K and Ladakh High Court, Srinagar; CM(M) 175/2023; Umar Farooq Khan v. Razia Sultan and Anr.; dismissal for non-prosecution; petitioner absent on 08.08.2025 and on 03.09.2025; interim directions vacated; single-judge bench of Wasim Sadiq Nargal, J.; order dated 03.09.2025; no advocates appeared.
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶15
Serial No. 34 Regular Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) 175/2023 CM 4849/2023
Umar Farooq Khan.
..…Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
Razia Sultan and Anr.
…Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE. ORDER
03.09.2025
(Wasim SadiqNargal) Judge
SRINAGAR
03.09.2025 Sabreena
1 issue framed by the court
How this case reached the court
No representation appeared for the petitioner on 08.08.2025 and again on the date of the order; the petitioner appears to have lost interest in prosecuting the matter.¶14
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
