The High Court dismissed the Writ petition filed by the petitioners for non-prosecution as the representatives failed to appear on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular List Serial No. 24
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM(M) No. 16/2024 CM No. 255/2024 CM No. 7389/2025 CM No. 2755/2025
Narinder Singh & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Through: None.
Vs
Ramesh Mangotra & Ors.
.….Respondents
Through: Mr. Ravinder Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aditya Vikram Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (11.12.2025)
01. On the last date of hearing which was 01.12.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the same is the position today also. These two non-appearances on behalf of the petitioners manifest that the petitioners are least interested in pursuing the present petition to its desired purpose. 02. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected applications. 03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE
JAMMU
11.12.2025
Bunty
Bunty Kumar 2025.12.15 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu
Narinder Singh & Ors.
Ramesh Mangotra & Ors.
Rahul Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
