Tauseef Ahmed Dar v. Union Territory of J and K and Anr. (Home Department)
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor respondents appeared despite multiple prior dates.
Bail application dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor respondents appeared despite multiple prior dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 01
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (Th. Virtual Mode)
Case:- B.A. No. 73/2023 CrlM No. 664/2023
Tauseef Ahmed Dar
…. Petitioner(s)
Through:None. V/s
UT of J&K and Anr.
….. Respondent(s)
Through:None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
14.11.2025
for non-prosecution, along with connected application.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
JAMMU
14.11.2025 Ram Krishan
Ram Krishan 2025.11.17 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tauseef Ahmed Dar
UT of J&K
Anr.
Javed Iqbal Wani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court