Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners failed to appear on the last date of hearing and again on the date of order, indicating lost interest; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 20
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:WP(C) No. 384/2020
M/s Babloo Vidya Peeth Senior Secondary School and another
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
JKBOSE and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Pariksha Parmar, Advocate vice Ms. Aruna Thakur, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER (22.10.2024)
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the
last date of hearing. Same is the position today which shows that the petitioners have lost interest to prosecute the matter.
In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE
JAMMU
22.10.2024
Shivalee
Shivalee Khajuria 2024.10.22 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/s Babloo Vidya Peeth Senior Secondary School and another
JKBOSE and others
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
