This order in a contempt petition held that proceedings stand closed as the respondents submitted that a speaking order rejected the claim. The appellant was granted liberty to challenge the order if cause survives.
Proceedings in the contempt petition stood closed; liberty granted to challenge the speaking order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 16 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPOWP No. 186/2017
Inhabitants of Village Dhara, Doda
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:Mr. Achal Sharma, Advocate.
V/s
State of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:Mr. R.S. Jamwal, AAG.
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER
“ MP disposed of with an observation that the respondents shall accord consideration to the release of unpaid wages to the job holders whose wages allegedly have been kept withheld. In the process, policy/rules/regulations shall be adhered to.”
2 CPOWP No. 186/2017
order, if cause survives.
(Sindhu Sharma) Judge
Jammu
07.02.2023 Michal Sharma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proceedings in the contempt petition stand closed as the respondents claim compliance with the earlier order.
Inhabitants of Village Dhara
State of J&K
Sindhu Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
