The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir adjudicated a writ petition, observing that the nature of the dispute required adjudication by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT).
Matter transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jammu Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.40
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2241/2018
Saroj Jamwal
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. K. Nirmal Kotwal, Advocate.
Vs
Union of India and Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. L. K. Moza, CGSC for R-1 to 5 & 7.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 27.12.2022
Learned appearing counsel for the parties would submit that the matter is required to be adjudicated by Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in view of the nature of dispute involved in petition. Ordered accordingly.
Registry to transfer the matter to Central Administrative Tribunal
(CAT), Jammu Bench, accordingly.
Parties to appear before Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT),
Jammu Bench while undertaking proceedings shall summoned respondent no. 6 afresh.
Interim direction, if any, to continue.
(Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge
Jammu 27.12.2022 Bunty
1 issue framed by the court
whether the dispute falls within the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)
Saroj Jamwal
Union of India
Javed Iqbal Wani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
