The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's prolonged absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case after multiple notices.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 19 After Notice.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
OWP No. 558/2015 Ia No. 01/2015.
Mohammad Ameen Hajam
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
State of JK & Ors.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sheikh Mushtaq, AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
01.11.2022.
Nobody has been appearing in this case for the petitioner for quite some time. Today also none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Seemingly the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting his case.
In the above background, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any shall stand vacated
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
SRINAGAR
01.11.2022
Showkat
Mohammad Ameen Hajam
State of JK & Ors.
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
