The High Court quashed the Tribunal's order dismissing a revision petition for non-prosecution without assigning reasons and remanded the matter for a reasoned hearing.
Order dated 23.06.2017 set aside; matter remanded to Tribunal to consider restoration application and pass reasoned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 14 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
OWP No. 1754/2018
Gulla Chat
…Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M. Amin Khan, & Mr. Peerzada Waheed, Advocates
Vs.
State of J&K and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. F. A. Bhat, AAG Mr. G. A. Lone, Advocate & Mr. Mujeeb Andrabi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R
18.11.2022
2
OWP No. 1754/2018
forming annexures A, B & C in a revision petition, which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 23.06.2017, which reads as under:-
“No cogent reason advanced for restoring the application, has been provided. Case not restored”.
SRINAGAR
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
18.11.2022 Manzoor
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 23.06.2017 passed by the Special Tribunal dismissing the revision petition for non-prosecution without reasons can be quashed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gulla Chat
State of J&K
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
