The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed the petition as withdrawn and vacated any interim directions.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn; interim direction, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 52. After Notice
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM (M) No. 165/2022 CM No. 4911/2022
Shahnaza Bano
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr M. Saleem Mir, Advocate.
VERSUS
Mohammad Altaf Khan.
…Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
09.11.2022.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to
withdraw the instant petition. His statement is taken on record.
The instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim direction, if any,
shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
SRINAGAR
09.11.2022 Showkat
Shahnaza Bano
Mohammad Altaf Khan
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
