Single judge order dismissing a writ petition as withdrawn by the counsel with liberty to file a fresh petition, noting the original was filed against a dead person.
Withdrawal accepted with liberty to file a fresh petition; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.27
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM(M) No.13/2021
Kuldeep Raj
….Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. G.S. Thakur, Advocate.
V/s
Kuldeep Raj Sharma
….Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition
with liberty to file fresh on the premise that the petition, inadvertently, was filed
against dead person. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
to learned counsel for the petitioner to file fresh.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri) Judge
Jammu: 09.11.2022 Eva
Kuldeep Raj
Kuldeep Raj Sharma
Rajesh Sekhri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
