Ashok Kumar v. State Th.S.S.P.Vigilance and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU OWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 78
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 178/2016 IA No. 1/2016
Ashok Kumar
.....Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Narinder Kr. Attri, Advocate
v/s
State of J&K and another
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Mr. Narinder Kr. Attri, Advocate fairly submits that the present
petition has been rendered infructous in view of filing of the challan against the petitioner. Mr. Attri further submits that the petitioner be permitted to raise all the pleas available to him during the course of trial.
In view of submission made by Mr. Attri, the present petition
along with connected IA is dismissed as having been rendered infructous. The
petitioner shall raise all the pleas available to him during the course of trial.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
JAMMU 14.09.2021 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
NEHA KUMARI 2021.09.15 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ashok Kumar
State of J&K
Rajneesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court