In OWP No. 120/2016, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's writ petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's absence on hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 31 After Notice Matters
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU &KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
OWP No. 120/2016
Haji Mehboob Khan
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: None
V/s
State of J&K and Ors. ….. Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge.
ORDER
01.12.2021
There was no representation on behalf of petitioner on last date of hearing. Today also, when the matter was called out nobody turned up to represent the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
SRINAGAR
01.12.2021
“Mir Arif”
AASIF GUL 2021.12.01 23:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Haji Mehboob Khan
State of J&K
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
