Sushma Devi and Ors. v. Sanjeet Kour and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear in the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 06
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
MA No. 507/2011
Sushma Devi and others. …Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Sanjeet Kour and anr.
…Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Kamal Gupta, Adv. for R-2.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
None has appeared for the appellant on 28.06.2021 and
23.07.2021. None appears today as well, so-much-so fresh particulars of
respondent No. 1 have not been furnished.
Continuous non-appearance of the appellants and their counsel
suggests that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith connected IA(s).
Interim direction, if any shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
Jammu 17.08.2021 Angita
Sushma Devi and others
Sanjeet Kour
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court