The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dismissed an appeal as infructuous after recording the counsel's statement to that effect, without engaging in substantive adjudication.
The appeal was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 204 Advance List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
LPASW No. 152/2017
Dr. Mohammad Jaffar Akhoon
…Petitioner(s).
Through: Mr. A. Hanan, Adv. vice Mr. Z. A. Shah, Sr. Adv.
Vs.
State of JK & Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Hamza Prince, Adv. vice Mr. M. Y. Bhat, Sr. Adv.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 12.02.2021
It is stated by both the learned counsel appearing for the parties that the appeal in hand has been rendered infructuous. Their statement is taken on record.
In view of the above, this appeal is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(SANJAY DHAR) (TASHI RABSTAN) JUDGE JUDGE
SRINAGAR 12.02.2021
Altaf
Dr. Mohammad Jaffar Akhoon
State of JK
TASHI RABSTAN
SANJAY DHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
