Dismissed
Mohd.Din v. State Th.Advocate General and Ors.
J&K HCCRR/34/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.No.43
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRR No.34/2013 IA No.18/2013
Mohd. Din
...Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. J.A.Hamal, Advocate
V/s
State of J&K and others
...Respondent(s)
Through:- None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner states at the Bar that this petition with the efflux of time has been rendered infructuous and, therefore, he has instructions from his client not to press the same.
His statement is recorded.
Accordingly, this petition along with connected application is dismissed as not pressed.
( Sanjeev Kumar) Judge
Jammu
17.08.2021 Vinod, PS
VINOD KUMAR 2021.08.18 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mohd. Din
State of J&K
Sanjeev Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court