Single judge order dismissing the instant petition as infructuous, as the respondent moved for withdrawal of the petition previously filed in the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 53
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 65/2021
Malika Begum and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Mohd Aamir Awan, Advocate
vs
Insha Parveen
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Bodh Raj Sharma, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has already
laid a motion before the learned trial court for withdrawal of the petiton filed
by the respondent that has been impugned in the instant petition.
In that view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed as
having been rendered infructuous.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
Jammu
08.11.2021 Rakesh
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Malika Begum and others
Insha Parveen
RAJNESH OSWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
