Dismissed
Tabassum Ara v. Qamar Shahban
J&K HCCrl R/8/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Crl…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Case No.21
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Crl R 8/2020 CrlM No. 192/2020
Tabassum Ara
..... petitioner (s)
Through :- None
V/s
.....Respondent(s)
Qamar Shahban
Through :- None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER On the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the case was called out, petitioner remained unrepresented. It appears that she has lost interest in prosecuting this petition.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JAMMU 01.12.2021 Sanjeev
Tabassum Ara
Qamar Shahban
Sanjeev Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court