In this appeal arising from the Jammu & Kashmir High Court, the sole proposition before the bench was whether the appellant desired to prosecute the underlying appeal. The appellant's counsel stated no such interest existed. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
The present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 3
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRA No. 9900003/2012 IA No. 99001/2012[D-145/2012]
Krishan Singh
.....Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Babu Ram Sharma, Advocate
v/s
State of J&K
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Aseem Sawhney, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
A perusal of file reveals that this Court vide order dated 08.03.2021 had directed the learned counsel for the appellant to ascertain as to
whether the appellant is interested in prosecution of this case or not.
Mr. Babu Ram Sharma, Advocate appears and submits that the
appellant does not want to pursue the present appeal.
In view of this, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
JAMMU 10.09.2021 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
NEHA KUMARI 2021.09.13 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Krishan Singh
State of J&K
Rajnish Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
