Rattano Devi v. Bana Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear for two consecutive dates and was found to have lost interest in the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 81
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CR No. 28/2021 CM 2756/2021
Ratano Devi
..... Petitioner (s)
Through :- None
V/s
Bana Ram
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Ashok Sharma Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER Nobody has been appearing in the case on behalf of the petitioner for
the last two consecutive dates. Today also, nobody has appeared on behalf of
the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecution of this case.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE
Jammu 06.09.2021 Sanjeev
Ratano Devi
Bana Ram
SANJAY DHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court