This is a one-line order where the single judge, relying on a dated 08.03.2021 order, held that the petitioner's claim was rejected due to a forged engagement order. Consequently, the instant contempt proceedings were found to have no substance and were closed.
The instant contempt proceedings are closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 75
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 298/2018 In CPSW No. 48/2017
Ayaz Ahmed
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Syed Nadeem Hamdani, Advocate
Vs
Farooq Ahmed Shah and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, JUDGE
ORDER
10.12.2021
Order of consideration dated 08.03.2021 has been passed, in which
the claim of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the engagement order produced by the petitioner is found to be forged and fake.
In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the instant contempt
proceedings, which is, accordingly, closed.
(Dhiraj Singh Thakur) Judge
Jammu 10.12.2021 Vishal
Ayaz Ahmed
Farooq Ahmed Shah and others
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
