Petitioner withdrew the contempt petition. Court dismissed the instant petition as withdrawn and directed listing of the main petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 240 After Notice List.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
CPOWP No. 279/2013.
Mohammad Shaban Sofi
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Mian Tufail, Advocate.
Vs
Farooq Ahmad Shah
…Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge
ORDER
09.02.2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner states at Bar that he does not want to press the instant contempt petition. His statement is taken on record.
As such the instant contempt petition bearing CPOWP No. 279/2013 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Let the main petition be listed on the appointed date.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
SRINAGAR 09.02.2021 “Showkat”
SHOWKAT HASSAN KHAN 2021.02.11 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mohammad Shaban Sofi
Farooq Ahmad Shah
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
