Shakeel Ahmed and Ors. v. State Th.Education Deptt.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition declared infructuous due to lapse of time; dismissed accordingly. No substantive legal issue addressed in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.13 2nd Supplementary
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 410/2016 (O & M) (Through Audio Calling)
Shakeel Ahmed and others …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. A. A. Khan, Advocate (Through Audio Call, 9419329670) v/s
State through Education Department and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that with the lapse of
time, the prayer made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 04.06.2020
Paramjeet
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
PARAMJEET SINGH 2020.06.08 17:17 I agree to specified portions of this document
Shakeel Ahmed and others
State through Education Department and others
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court