The High Court transferred the service dispute record of Union Territory employees to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, citing Notifications conferring jurisdiction to the Tribunal. The parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal.
The record of the present case is transferred to CAT, Jammu Bench, with a soft copy retained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.No.368 Supplementary-2 List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No.23/2008 (O&M)
Tariq Hussain …Petitioner(s)
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 02.09.2020 Muzammil.Q Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
MUZAMIL QADIR 2020.09.29 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the jurisdiction to decide service disputes of Union Territory employees lies with this Court or the Central Administrative Tribunal
Whether the record of the service dispute needs to be transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal
Tariq Hussain
State of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
