The High Court held that it does not have jurisdiction to hear a petition relating to subjects under Section 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
The record of the petition was transmitted to the CAT Jammu Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 209
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU SWP no. 1563/2006 & IA no. 1916/2006
Nishat Kalia.
…Petitioner(s)
v
State of J&K & ors.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM :
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, Judge. ORDER
(Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge
Jammu, 06.07.2020
Neha
NEHA KUMARI 2020.07.15 20:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a petition relating to subjects covered by Section 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
To whom should the petition be transferred for adjudication.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Nishat Kalia
State of J&K
Ali Mohammad Magrey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
