Sudesh Kumar Gupta and Anr. v. State Th.Cooperative Deptt.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
No.333 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.333
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
(Through Video Conferencing at Jammu)
OWP 1019/2014
IA(1377/2014)
Sudesh Kumar Gupta and another
…Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. M. A. Bhat, Advocate (Through video conference)
v/s
Union of India and others
….Respondent(s)
Through:-Mr. Sumeer Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No. 4
(Through video conference)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE ORDER
Mr. M. A. Bhat states that the instant petition has been rendered
infructuous, as such, is not pressed.
Dismissed as not pressed.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
Jammu
11.11.2020
Bir
BIR BAHADUR SINGH 2020.11.17 11:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sudesh Kumar Gupta
Union of India
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court