Abdul Rashid Dar and Ors. Vs Ajeet Kumar Sahu and Ors. (Public Health Engineering Department)

During pendency of the instant contempt petition, the incumbentrespondents have changed their position either on account of retirement or transfer to some other office, as such, no useful purpose can be achieved by keeping the instant contempt petition pending, therefore, the same is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the present incumbents with a copy of the order, subject matter of the contempt petition, for seeking implementation of the same, of course, in case same has remained unimplemented so far. Further, in the event, the petitioners, after availing the aforesaid liberty, are still dissatisfied as regards the implementation of the directions of this Court, they shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings for implementation of the same in accordance with law.

¶16

Contempt petition disposed of as above.

¶17

(Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge

¶18

SRINAGAR: 22.09.2020 “Hamid”

¶19

ABDUL HAMID BHAT 2020.09.22 13:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Abdul Rashid Dar and Ors. v. Ajeet Kumar Sahu and Ors. (Public Health Engineering Department)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Rashid Dar and Ors. v. Ajeet Kumar Sahu and Ors. (Public Health Engineering Department)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tsewang Narboo Vs State and Others (C. a. and P. D.)

Arshid Ahmad Naik and Anr. Vs Abdul Majid and Anr.

Fayaz Ahmad Kalas and Others Vs State Forest Corporation and Others

Mohammad Abass Vs State of J and K and Ors.

Umbreen Rafiquee Vs State of Jandk and Ors.

Sajad Hussain Bhat Vs Owais and Ors. (Health and Medical Education Department)