Contempt petition dismissed due to change in respondent officers, allowing party to approach new incumbents for implementation of directions or file fresh proceedings if unsatisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
Through V.C Sr. No.240
CPSW 564/2018
Mohammad Ashraf Tantray and ors.
….Petitioner(s)
Hirdesh Kumar and ors.
CORAM:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, Judge
ORDER
16.11.2020
During pendency of the instant contempt petition, the incumbentrespondents have changed their position either on account of retirement or transfer to some other office, as such, no useful purpose can be achieved by keeping the instant contempt petition pending, therefore, the same is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the present incumbents with a copy of the order, subject matter of the contempt petition, for seeking implementation of the same, of course, in case same has remained unimplemented so far. Further, in the event, the petitioners, after availing the aforesaid liberty, are still dissatisfied as regards the implementation of the directions of this Court, they shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings for implementation of the same in accordance with law.
Contempt petition disposed of as above.
SRINAGAR 16.11.2020 Gh. Nabi Secy
GH NABI MALIK 2020.11.17 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mohammad Ashraf Tantray and ors.
Hirdesh Kumar and ors.
Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
