The High Court disposed of a contempt petition by dismissing it. The respondents, originally named in the petition, had retired or transferred. The court granted liberty to approach current incumbents for implementation.
Liberty granted to approach present incumbents for implementation of directions; second proceeding allowed if still dissatisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 237 AFTER NOTICE CAUSELIST (Through Virtual Mode )
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
CPSW No. 15/2018
Aijaz Ahmad Wani.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
Abdul Majid & Anr.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr Feroz Ahmad Sheikh, Dy. AG
CORAM :
Hon’ble Mr Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, Judge.
ORDER
25.09.2020
During pendency of the instant contempt petition, the incumbent-
respondents have changed their position either on account of retirement or transfer to some other office, as such, no useful purpose can be achieved by keeping the instant contempt petition pending, therefore, the same is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the present incumbents with a copy of the order, subject matter of the contempt petition, for seeking implementation of the same, of course, in case same has remained unimplemented so far. Further, in the event, the petitioner, after availing the aforesaid liberty, is still dissatisfied as regards the implementation of the directions of this Court, he shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings for implementation of the same in accordance with law.
Contempt petition disposed of as above.
(Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge
SRINAGAR: 25.09.2020 “Hamid”
ABDUL HAMID BHAT 2020.09.25 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Aijaz Ahmad Wani
Abdul Majid
Ali Mohammad Magrey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
