This order allowed an application seeking withdrawal of appeal CM No. 16/2017 and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn while vacating any interim direction.
Application for withdrawal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 6 Suppl. List-1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
(THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE)
CM No. 2055/2020 In CMAM No. 16/2017
Bajaj Allianz Insu.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr Imtiyaz Ahmad, Advocate.
Vs.
Ghulam Qadir Lone & Ors.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr B.A. Tak, Advocate.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge (Through Video Conferencing from Jammu wing of the High Court)
(ORDER) 19.06.2020
Instant application seeking withdrawal of the appeal (CMAM No.
16/2017), for the reasons mentioned therein, is allowed and the appeal (CMAM No. 16/2017) is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
Srinagar 19.06.2020 “Bhat Altaf, PS”
MOHAMMAD ALTAF BHAT 2020.06.22 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for withdrawal of an appeal is allowed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bajaj Allianz Insu.
Ghulam Qadir Lone & Ors.
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
