Abdul Majeed Dar v. Ghulam Hassan Ghazi
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.254
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
(Through Video Conference)
CM(M) No. 73/2019
Abdul Majeed Dar
...Petitioner/Applicant(s)
Through :- None V/s
Ghulam Hassan Ghazi
.....Respondent (s)
Through :- None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
(through Video Conference from residence in Jammu)
ORDER 03.11.2020
The present petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of the complaint titled, Abdul Majeed Dar vs. Ghulam Hassan Ghazi pending before the Court of JMIC (Sub Registrar), Srinagar.
Pursuant to the direction of this Court, the learned Magistrate has filed detailed report, in which the time consumed by the complainant as well as the accused has been explained. It is stated that there is no delay on the part of the Court and the delay if any was due to the application filed by the complainant summoning the Postman of the High Court, which application was subsequently withdrawn by the complainant. Later on due COVID-19 pandemic, no effective proceedings could be conducted.
In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction JMIC(Sub Registrar) Srinagar to take the matter expeditiously taking into consideration the SOPs prescribed by the High Court during COVID-19 pandemic.
Disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 03.11.2020 Rakesh
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
RAKESH KUMAR 2020.11.04 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Abdul Majeed Dar
Ghulam Hassan Ghazi
Rajnish Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court