Happy Garg v. Ms Sanjeev Enterprises
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant sought three weeks’ time to bring the legal representatives of the sole respondent on record after the respondent’s sole proprietor was stated to have expired. The matter was listed after three weeks.
What the court decided
Happy Garg alias Ambrish Garg vs. M/s Sanjeev Enterprises
RSA No.80 of 2013.
19.09.2026 Present:
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel, for the respondent.
It is contended by learned vice counsel for the respondent that the sole proprietor of the respondent, Shri Ravi Bhatia, has expired during the pendency of the appeal. Her said statement is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks three
weeks’ time to take consequential steps for bringing on record the legal representatives of the sole respondent.
List after three weeks.
( Romesh Verma )
Judge 19th September, 2026 (krt)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Happy Garg alias Ambrish Garg
- respondent
M/s Sanjeev Enterprises
Coram
Romesh Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/80/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court