Dismissed¶7
Hari Singh v. Chaino
Himachal Pradesh HCRSA/393/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Hari Singh v Chaino & Ors | RSA No. 393 of 2005 | decided 18.03.2026 | Judge Rakesh Kainthla | appeal dismissed in default - appellant repeatedly absent, no reasonable cause assigned, shown not interested in pursuing matter | respondents 3 & 4 represented by R.K. Sharma (Senior Adv.) with Shivani Thakur.
What did the court decide?
The present appeal is dismissed in default because the appellant neither appeared when the case was repeatedly called nor assigned any reasonable cause for his non-appearance, which shows he is not interested in pursuing the matter. ¶7