Regular second appeal abated following the deaths of appellants No.5 and 6, as surviving appellants failed to bring their legal representatives on record despite sufficient opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Gian Chand & Others versus Durga & Others
RSA No. 11 of 2015
02.07.2026
Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vanshika, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. George, Advocate, for the respondents.
On 24.02.2026, the factum of death of
appellants No.5 and 6 was disclosed and thereafter, number of opportunities were given to the other appellants to take appropriate steps for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased appellants No.5 and 6. Despite sufficient opportunities granted to appellants No.1 to 4, requisite steps have not been taken.
As per the learned counsel representing appellants No.1 to 4, despite repeated correspondence made with the above appellants, necessary instructions have not been imparted. The documents, so produced, are ordered to be taken on record.
Considering the said fact, this Court is left with no option, but, to dismiss the appeal, as abated. Ordered accordingly.
(Virender Singh) Judge
July 02, 2026 (ps)
Gian Chand & Others
Durga & Others
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
