Dinesh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Dinesh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Execution petition disposed of after noting respondents' office instructions dated 30.04.2026 and pensionary yearly statements (FY 2025-26 and 2026-27) showing petitioner in receipt of pension; liberty reserved to petitioner to pursue appropriate lawful remedy for any surviving grievances; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also disposed of.

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents have complied with the decision in Dinesh Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. (CWPOA No. 6246/2019, decided on 19.06.2023), i.e., whether the petitioner is in receipt of pension in terms of the consideration order dated 18.08.2024.

Court's answer

Taking note of the office instructions dated 30.04.2026 and the petitioner's pensionary yearly statements for financial year 2025-26 and ongoing financial year 2026-27 placed on record by the learned Deputy Advocate General, the petitioner is in receipt of pension.

Ratio / Principle

On that showing, the present execution petition stands disposed of; liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Execution Petition (High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.; decided 05.05.2026): Petitioner sought compliance with the earlier decision in Dinesh Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. (CWPOA No. 6246/2019, decided on 19.06.2023), alleging non-compliance despite a consideration order dated 18.08.2024 and stating he was not in receipt of pension in terms thereof. Learned Deputy Advocate General placed on record office instructions dated 30.04.2026 together with the petitioner's pensionary yearly statements for FY 2025-26 and the ongoing FY 2026-27, conveying that the petitioner is in receipt of pension. Taking note of these documents, the execution petition was disposed of, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for any surviving grievances; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Execution Petition No. 56/2026 Decided on: 05.05.2026

Dinesh Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua , Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹ For the petitioner: Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J.

Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rangil Singh, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and 4, respectively.

2. Petitioner is with the grievance that the decision rendered

in Dinesh Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.² has not been complied with by the respondents till date even though consideration order was passed on 18.08.2024.

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2 CWPOA No. 6246/2019 decided on 19.06.2023

2

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner is not in receipt of pension in terms of the above consideration order.

3. Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record a copy of office instructions dated 30.04.2026, including the pensionary yearly statement of the petitioner for the financial year 2025-26, and ongoing financial year 2026-27, conveying that the petitioner is in receipt of pension.

4 . Taking note of office instructions and the pensionary yearly statements of the petitioner placed on record, the present execution petition to stand disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

05^th May, 2026 (rohit)