Disposed¶21

Gopal Singh Verma v. State of Hp and Another

Himachal Pradesh HC1 Jul 2026EX.PT/19/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

HP High Court Shimla; Ex. Pet.(T) No.19 of 2026; decided 01.07.2026; Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.; Gopal Singh Verma v. State of H.P.; execution petition disposed of; implementation of judgment directed within three weeks (on or before 23.07.2026); costs Rs. 5,000/- paid by cheque per order dated 03.06.2026; office instructions dated 01.07.2026, Director School Education; approval subject to proposed Special Leave Petition by State; liberty reserved to petitioner for surviving grievances.

What did the court decide?

Execution petition disposed of; respondents directed to implement the judgment within three weeks, i.e. on or before 23.07.2026; costs of Rs. 5,000/- (order dated 03.06.2026) paid by cheque handed over to the petitioner's counsel; liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for surviving grievances, if any. ¶21

Gopal Singh Verma Vs State of Hp and Another — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶21

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to implement the judgment in question within a stipulated period.

¶21

Court's answer

In view of the documents placed on record and the assurance given by the learned Additional Advocate General, the execution petition stands disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful by implementing the judgment within three weeks from today, i.e. on or before 23.07.2026.

¶21

Ratio / Principle

Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law.

¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Ex. Pet.(T) No.19 of 2026, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (decided 01.07.2026, Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.) — Execution petition by Gopal Singh Verma against the State of H.P. and another, seeking implementation of a judgment, disposed of. The learned Additional Advocate General handed over a cheque of Rs. 5,000/- towards costs imposed by order dated 03.06.2026 and placed on record office instructions dated 01.07.2026 of the Director School Education, Himachal Pradesh, conveying government approval to implement the judgment in question subject to the final outcome of the Special Leave Petition proposed to be filed by the State, together with the office letter dated 01.07.2026 of the Secretary (Education). On the assurance that implementation would occur within three weeks, the Court directed the respondents to implement the judgment on or before 23.07.2026 and reserved liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy for any surviving grievances in accordance with law.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Ex. Pet.(T) No.19 of 2026

¶3

Decided on: 1^st July, 2026

¶4

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gopal Singh Verma …..Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of H.P. and another .....Respondents

¶7

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¶8

Coram

¶9

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶10

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶11

For the Petitioner: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate.

¶12

For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

¶13

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶14

Learned Additional Advocate General has

¶15

handed over a cheque drawn in the name of the petitioner to his learned counsel in the sum of Rs.5000/- as costs imposed in the order dated 03.06.2026.

¶16

2. Learned Additional Advocate General has also placed on record office instructions dated 01.07.2026 from the Director School Education, Himachal Pradesh, conveying approval of the government for implementing the judgment in question subject to final outcome of the Special

¶17

Leave petition proposed to be filed by the State in the

¶18

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes

¶19

¶20

matter. Office letter dated 01.07.2026, addressed by the Secretary (Education) to the Director School Education, Himachal Pradesh, conveying the aforesaid approval, has also been appended alongwith the office instructions. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the judgment shall now be implemented within a period of three weeks from today.

¶21

In view of the documents placed on record and the assurance given by the learned Additional Advocate General, this execution petition to stand disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful by implementing the judgment within three weeks from today, i.e. on or before 23.07.2026. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law.

¶22

Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 01, 2026 Judge Mukesh

Gopal Singh Verma v. State of Hp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal Singh Verma v. State of Hp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Monika Padda Vs the State of Hp and Another

Prem Lata Vs State of Hp and Others

Onkar Chand Vs the Hpsebl and Another

Sukhi Ram and Anr. Vs the State of Hp and Others

M/S Milestone Gears Pvt. Ltd. Unit-Ix Vs Amar Singh Bhatia and Another

Shubham Sharma Vs Kamlesh Kumar Panth and Anr.