Disposed¶15

Megh Singh v. the Hrtc and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC3 Jun 2026EX.P./976/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Megh Singh v. HRTC & Ors; Ex. Pet No.976 of 2026; High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla; decided 03.06.2026; Judge Jyotsna Rewal Dua; execution petition disposed of; retiral benefits; delayed payment; interest component to be paid by respondents on or before 03.07.2026; liberty reserved to petitioner for surviving grievances; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to pay the outstanding interest component of the petitioner's delayed retiral benefits on or before 03.07.2026; liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for surviving grievances in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. ¶15

Megh Singh Vs the Hrtc and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

Ex. Pet No.976 of 2026 Decided on: 03.06.2026

¶3

_________________________________________________________________ Megh Singh ....Petitioner Versus HRTC & Ors …Respondents

¶4

Coram

¶5

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶6

1 Whether approved for reporting?

¶7

_________________________ For the petitioner:	_______________________ Mr. Manohar Advocate.	_________________ Lal Sharma,
For the respondents:	Mr. Vinod K Thaku	r, Advocate .

¶8

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶9

Learned counsel for the respondents has placed

¶10

on record office instructions dated 08.04.2026 and on that basis submits that all due and admissible retiral benefits stand released to the petitioner and only interest component on account of delayed payment of retiral benefits remains to be paid. He further submits that this liability shall also be

¶11

cleared by the respondents within four weeks from today i.e. by or before 03.07.2026.

¶12

2. In view of above, present execution petition is

¶13

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

¶14

¶15

disposed of with direction to the respondents to make payment of aforesaid liability on or before 03.07.2026. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law.

¶16

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall

¶17

also stand disposed of.

¶18

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶19

June 3, 2026 R.Atal

Megh Singh v. the Hrtc and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Megh Singh v. the Hrtc and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naveen Kumar Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Gohri Devi Vs State of Hp and Others

Radhna Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Nikhil Awasthi and Others Vs Ashok Kumar Panda and Another

Ganga Singh Thakur and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others

Virender Singh Vs Tata Motors Finance Ltd. (Tata Capitals Ltd) and Others